Interterm 2020
Email: aalumkal@iliff.edu
Click link below for syllabus in Word file:
AlumkalIST2206ProgressiveChristianityFinal.docx
The course aims to familiarize students with the following aspects of the Progressive Christianity: 1) its historical and sociological context, 2) the arguments of its most popular writers, 3) critiques leveled against it, and 4) how it operates as a social movement. Additionally, students are encouraged to arrive at their own theological and normative evaluation of this tradition.
Borg, Marcus J. 2003. The Heart of Christianity: Rediscovering a Life of Faith. San Francisco: HarperSanFranciso. Evans, Christopher. 2010. Liberalism without Illusions: Renewing an American Christian Tradition. Waco: Baylor University Press. Spong, John Shelby. 2018. Unbelievable: Why neither Ancient Creeds nor the Reformation Can Produce a Living Faith Today. San Francisco: HarperOne. Edles, Laura Desfor. 2013. “Contemporary Progressive Christianity and Its Symbolic Ramifications.” Cultural Sociology 7: 3-22. Johnson, Luke Timothy. 1996. The Real Jesus: The Misguided Quest for the Historical Jesus and the Truth of the Traditional Gospels. New York: HarperOne. Chapter 1. Tinker, Tink. 2013. “Why I Do not Believe in a Creator.” Pp. 167-179 in Buffalo Shout, Salmon Cry: Conversations on Creation, Land Justice, and Life Together, edited by Steve Heinrichs. Waterloo, Ontario: Herald Press. Little, Anita. 2017. “A Progressive Christian Conference with an All-White Lineup: What Could Go Wrong?” Religion Dispatches. http://religiondispatches.org/a-progressive-christian-conference-with-an-all-white-lineup-what-could-go-wrong/ Long, Thomas. 2017. “The Binary Christianity of Marcus Borg.” The Christian Century. https://www.christiancentury.org/review/binary-christianity-of-marcus-borg Sachs, William. 2018. Review of Unbelievable: Why neither Ancient Creeds nor the Reformation Can Produce a Living Faith Today by John Shelby Spong. Reading Religion. https://readingreligion.org/books/unbelievable
Iliff’s previous interterm courses all met in person for large blocks of time over one or two weeks. Given current realities, we will use a combination of synchronous Zoom sessions and asynchronous discussions on Canvas. After you have made your initial post, please make a substantive response to another student’s post. Appropriate response posts would include (but not be limited to) the following: 1) answering a question posed by your classmate, 2) discussing your agreement or disagreement with the post, 3) asking a question about the post, 4) relating the post to your experience. Deadlines for the two posts will be listed in Canvas. Discussion Group Conduct The course should involve a free exchange of ideas, which means you are welcome to express your viewpoints and to disagree with the viewpoints of the instructor or your fellow students. This should always be done in a way that shows respect for the other people involved in the course. If you are not sure how to disagree without coming across as disrespectful, try saying, “I would like to respectfully disagree with that.” Many students like saying, “Let me push back on that…” which also works. Posts that fail to adhere to Iliff’s standards of conduct will be marked down.
Grading: Zoom Participation: 25% Discussion Posts: 25% Final Paper: 50% Students may take the course pass/fail. You do not need to provide an explanation for why you are choosing this option. My assumption is that students in a masters program can be expected to produce above average academic work. Therefore, the modal grade I assign is B+. A paper will earn a B+ if it 1) fulfills all of the requirements of the assignment and 2) demonstrates that the student has a solid (though not necessarily flawless) understanding of the concepts in the course readings and lectures. A paper will earn a grade higher than a B+ if it fulfills the assignment and demonstrates exceptional insight into the course concepts. A paper will earn a grade of B or B- if there are minor to moderate shortcomings in either fulfilling the assignment or demonstrating understanding of course concepts. Grades below B- are reserved for papers with major shortcomings in either area. Students will receive full credit (an A) for active participation in the Zoom sessions and for completing their Canvas posting according to the guidelines.
Date | Day | Details | |
Nov 28, 2020 | Sat | Course Introduction | due by 06:58AM |
Nov 28, 2020 | Sat | Introduce Yourself | due by 06:59AM |
Nov 30, 2020 | Mon | History of Liberalism | due by 07:59PM |
Nov 30, 2020 | Mon | Synchronous Session 1 | due by 08:00PM |
Dec 02, 2020 | Wed | Discussion 1 | due by 06:59AM |
Dec 03, 2020 | Thu | Marcus Borg and Critics | due by 07:59PM |
Dec 03, 2020 | Thu | Synchronous Session 2 | due by 08:00PM |
Dec 05, 2020 | Sat | Discussion 2 | due by 06:59AM |
Dec 07, 2020 | Mon | John Shelby Spong | due by 07:59PM |
Dec 07, 2020 | Mon | Synchronous Session 3 | due by 08:00PM |
Dec 09, 2020 | Wed | Discussion 3 | due by 06:59AM |
Dec 10, 2020 | Thu | Progressive Christianity as Social Movement | due by 07:59PM |
Dec 10, 2020 | Thu | Synchronous Session 4 | due by 08:00PM |
Dec 12, 2020 | Sat | Discussion 4 | due by 06:59AM |
Dec 22, 2020 | Tue | Final Paper | due by 06:59AM |